To me it is far from absurd. I am only heard of it here. Why do you think it is absurd? It makes good economic sense from the government to deamand that the risk be shared.
What I want to know is when did directors know of this. And why haven't they already a contingency for it.
Let me reiterate this is one of two real issues I have with the directors. I am not using wide brush strokes to decry everything else they have done.
