To me it is far from absurd. I am only heard of it here. Why do you think it is absurd? It makes good economic sense from the government to deamand that the risk be shared.
What I want to know is when did directors know of this. And why haven't they already a contingency for it.
Let me reiterate this is one of two real issues I have with the directors. I am not using wide brush strokes to decry everything else they have done.
To me it is far from absurd. I am only heard of it here. Why do...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add VRC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.001(25.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $20.79M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.4¢ | $5.49K | 1.181M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | 30298271 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 5169200 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.13pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| VRC (ASX) Chart |