Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 4C Cash Flow Report, page-40

That's a very difficult and personal question as my investment criteria I am sure, differs to everyone else but probably same in that, we all hope to make money. But it would come down to risk v return, which also has a time factor (time value of money is very important).

I would like to see the clear path towards commercialisation and communicated to the shareholders. Given the capital intensity of the Hadrian machines they really need to revisit their key goals to achieve this, either through partnership deals for manufacturing, or through IP or something similar. I do not think they should go into the construction of buildings as this is not what they specialise in and currently, not profitable.

I would also like to see the Pivacs held accountable for their previous actions, which is extremely hard given their controlling interest in the company. I am certainly not saying that FBR and the Pivacs should part ways, but perhaps either step down from certain positions or side step to someone who can renew confidence in the company and provide strong leadership for the commercialisation pathway.

Along with that, commercially viable contracts along with cost minimisation (although they have greatly reduced their costs during covid - but more so for executive salaries and bonuses).

The company needs to set clear goals and clear milestones that benefit all shareholders. Most SHs bought in believed in the tech, so they need to make it work and realise that in a reasonable time frame.

Robotic construction has a future, it's up to tech companies to make it work with the right people.

Incorrect, but I think you are getting confused. Terms of contract matter for revenue recognition for financial reporting in the P&L, but for cash yes, you would recognise it in the 4C regardless (and in the cash flow statement).

Nope.

Not sure where you got the idea that there will be a completely new seperate machine.