The tall tales and jokes of the down ramping clownship would at...

The tall tales and jokes of the down ramping clownship would at least result in a chuckle if nothing else right?

The guy that two years ago got embarrassed when I showed him how he is trying to stickytape one announcement over another and make very false, intentionally I may add, conclusions, has found now a good time to open his mouth again.

The question for ASX is clear.

Suspending an already publicly trading company is not as simple as pressing a button. There are many various ramifications for all parties involved.

IF they think that the company is illegitimate for any reason and therefore they have suspended it, then what the hell were they doing when they allowed it to trade in the first place?

On top of that, they suspended the company over a year ago, and at that point Miggster partnership existed. Nothing is new. How was it that they allowed the company to trade again?

What is the reason they are asking Emerge gaming all these questions and not a whole range of other companies on ASX that have either hyped rubbish and robbed shareholders off their money and/or been involved in illegal activity such as funding child pornography and money laundry practices? Where is their suspension? Where is their questions? Or does ASX just suspend those that are not able to sue them?