Yeah, ok - but unless you have multiple accounts, you ONLY do this with DW8.
Weird you are this forensic and interested, but only in one company.
And weird it's always with the "DW8 must be up to funny business" line.
November - you identified a graph that erroneously included an extra '000 on the identifier. Of no consequence at all.
Nothing until April, when you picked something up. That was mended and explained in an amended quarterly that day. It wasn't of much consequence either.
Now this one - its the companies job to clarify and amend, if these are errors. Lets see if they do.
But the discrepancies you've found are hardly anything other than figures that don't align, and 2 out of the 3 have been incredibly pedantic. If this is how "they con the market", they're doing it wrong. These aren't fudged figures that are going to pump a share price, for example.
So yeah, again - someone with this much time to forensically pour over financials and identify things that dont quite add up would suggest you do it.
As said, good pick ups by you. It's very sloppy by DW8, no argument from me - but their problem to amend and explain, if required.
But why do you only do it with one company?
In summary - the November 21 error you found was of no consequence. The April one was amended and explained that day. This one hasnt had a chance to be amended and explained.
In every instance you explicated said DW8 was perhaps fudging numbers on purpose.
So yeah - this much interest and time to crunch numbers. But only with DW8 every 3 to 6 months.
So is this a multi account of another where you discuss and communicate all your "research" to hold companies to account?
You aren't wrong, but have been overly pedantic in the past. But the effort you put in doesn't up to this account being silent except when a DW8 quarterly has a mistake, however tiny.
All the best.
Expand
(20min delay)