Fair enough Bas. 64347280 - that is not discussing the stock. It...

Fair enough Bas.

64347280​

- that is not discussing the stock.

It is. I am replying to a tag discussing the stock (Inferred)"the stock is in suspension"

64347490 - that is not discussing the stock.

It is. I am replying to a tag discussing the stock (Inferred) where I mention in regards to CGB. " I am not a Top5 shareholder anymore. "

64347538 - that is not discussing the stock.

It is. Inferred wth relevance to CGB. I ask rotorman to look up posts. Which he also replied too on CGB.

64347721 - that is not discussing the stock.

It is. Inferred with referencing to conversation of data I posted on CGB pricing. "I took the price range in his first paragraph, not the other comment in the 2nd paragraph." #:64337245. Others undertsood what I was saying as I was tagged about it.

64348036 - that is not discussing the stock.

It is. I am replying to a tag from Chris67 discussing the posts on the CGB forum (Inferred) "this is a stock discussion forum" Chris referring to my commentary in the CGB forum on HotCopper.

64348702 - that is not discussing the stock.
It is. I was virtually imploring you to drop this tit and tat posting in that post. "Let's talk about CGB, Basileus". I say.

6/6 you missed the point of the posts. But look, I understand you have struggled with my posts as I with yours, and so I also wish you au revior, as well. So does that mean you will also stop using inferences, like I helped with clarifying above, i.e. using my comments but just not mentioning me by name?

I dont need to go into referencing CGB in stock detail here as I have tried to address your 6 references and explain.

Hoping everyone has a better investment week and let's hope that CGB deliver something good for all of us by Friday.