If that was the case then you would have to ask yourself what...

If that was the case then you would have to ask yourself what was the reason behind creating a court order against the development of the LNG project using a fictitious document that couldn’t be produced then or years later at the appeal. Who stood to benefit from the court order ? Why was the appeal allowed to proceed ? Who is there now that stands to benefit from that ? Should parts or everything Indonesian be sold or should income be derived into the future ? The answer is obviously the latter. I would hazard a guess and say that Bakrie’s see them selves staying in business longer than EWC in Indonesia given the understanding that Bakrie have of the Indonesian policy process that EWC obviously is stumbling over.
No doubt SE would prefer to develop the LNG plant exclusively but is it possible and is it the best course for EWC long term ? How many obstacles would disappear with an Indonesian partner ? Who had to pay to join ?

There are more issues within EWC than just this one, it is a prime example. I want to see some contracts in place.