Thats the correct approach with him. His one deeply flawed...

Thats the correct approach with him.
His one deeply flawed argument from day one is that he regards everything that comes from AKP either written or verbal as "fact".
Anyone else who counters -even in the meekest mildest way, is using only "opinions" without any factual basis. The huge flaw in his whole premise is that 10 years have shown that AKP do not present "facts" at all. Never have and never will.

He then attempts to put that person the defensive, using childish arguments akin to saying "but what proof do you have that the sun is actually the sun?" before defaulting to mockery or the ignore button. His little nobs-ONLY after BobF has put the boot in first, then follow for a while with the derision.

Under which rock are you now hiding oh little nobs?

He has probably been the biggest obstacle to balanced reasoned rational discussion on AKP over the years. All just my opinion lol.