Hi @nameuser , Ok, I think I understand what you're saying....

Hi @nameuser ,
Ok, I think I understand what you're saying. You're referring to words, views. Probably not from MB, if you don't mind me guessing.
I am referring to, or rather I am interested in, statements about the technical integration of PureGRAPH.
So it may be that we look at things differently.
Could it be that there has been too much talk about possibilities without enough talk about technical realisation and this task? That's why I really like Todd's interview at the time or the interviews with AG.
Or: the task of MB, market maker, how is that to be understood with what you are waiting for? (Too slow)
Okay, I'd better leave it. It's not what I want to say either.
I would like to point out that, in my opinion, FGR has found something with grinding aid that signifies future. And a lot has been achieved here in a reasonable to good amount of time.

What should be in the foreground?
The reports of the last few years on cement / concrete or a picture that was explained even older and rather blurred?
I hope that deepl has translated my thoughts properly and I don't want to offend you either. I just want the long-time posters here to look at the current development on cement / concrete without any other thoughts. Yes, I'm glad that MB has set the focus here. An L2 point that I used to miss (in the past).

Best,
L