I know it can be seen as pedantic but it has constantly irked me the way this company presents scientific data.
For a company claiming to be at the very edge of a particular area of science one would think that they could conform to the standard forms of scientific expression and presentation.
I won’t start here today about their ability to present data graphically.
These documents will be read, hopefully, by leading pharmaceutical authorities and companies.
Just a couple of simple examples today -
(1) “at an infusion rate of 30 minutes”
30 mins is not a rate it is a time period.
What they mean is “over an infusion time of 30 minutes”; and
“at a faster infusion rate of 15 minutes“
What they mean is “at a faster infusion rate over a 15 minute period”
and
(2) “resulted in over a >99% reduction“
When it should be either “resulted in over a 99% reduction” or “resulted in a >99% reduction”.
They really should employ a scientist to write their scientific reports.
poorinvestor
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RCE
- Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 4C Cash Flow Report
Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 4C Cash Flow Report, page-4
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RCE (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
53.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(2.75%) |
Mkt cap ! $108.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
56.0¢ | 56.0¢ | 53.0¢ | $30.37K | 56.27K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 17 | 53.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
55.5¢ | 40000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 17 | 0.530 |
1 | 8653 | 0.520 |
2 | 51000 | 0.510 |
5 | 78000 | 0.500 |
1 | 50000 | 0.495 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.555 | 40000 | 1 |
0.560 | 1309 | 1 |
0.565 | 26178 | 1 |
0.570 | 49979 | 1 |
0.580 | 8333 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.48pm 25/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RCE (ASX) Chart |