Share
1,749 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 146
clock Created with Sketch.
06/08/24
12:50
Share
Originally posted by BobF:
↑
You are a waste of my time. Back onto ignore you go. This is all entirely supposition and guesswork on your part - yet you post and state it as if it was based on real evidence. Do you know what level of cooperation there is between AKP management and EM's activities? No. It is purely your own presupposition. There is no basis for the statement "How could they (know)?" Really? How could you know differently? Were you there on the phonecall too? No. It's a guess. Do you know that there has not been significant progress? No. That's a guess too. Do you know that there is no oversight or control? No. It's a guess coloured by animosity. Do you know what the future developments are going to be? No. It's all a guess. In reality you have ZERO evidence for any such assertions. How could you have any? All you offer is hostile negativity based on worst-possible-case suppositions and interpolations that are themselves clearly based on a desperate desire for those things to be true. That, of necessity, has to contradict anything and everything announced by the company. In your view nothing from the company can be believed, but your opinions can and should be. Really? You clearly appear to be massively motivated to try to convince other holders that the company and its people have no merit. You post on nothing else. Yet you have no skin in the game whatsoever. Really? Why? You are entitled to your own opinion on any matter, and to state them. But if your main mission in posting on HC is solely to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt, and to undermine and criticise AKP and then expect to be taken seriously then you need to base your arguments on facts that can be independently checked . As with your post above nothing you suggest is true can be checked against anything. It is all solely your opinion. I have based my examination of AKP on the only information that is available namely the statements coming out of the company. If that announced information is proved to be untrue and worse - deliberately false, then I accept fully that while I will pay the price for my gullibility, it will not prove that I misled anyone. It will prove that the company has not told me the truth, when it knew it. But if you are proved wrong who has any claim against you for your opinions being false and mischievously so? I no longer wish to hear your destructive and baseless opinions. Feel free to put me onto ignore as well so you don't have to hear mine.
Expand
Bob, you have been making baseless, non evidence based statements for over a decade. The only difference between your posts and Shortblacks is the bullish and bearish thesis. Going by the current state of events, clearly you have been wrong many times more than shortblack. The fact that you cannot see this is a perfect representation of the type of individual who is currently invested in this stock.