None of the "green" alternatives offset their construction...

  1. 2,727 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 582
    None of the "green" alternatives offset their construction footprint, and they all miss by a large amount, it's a scam.
    Nuclear costs a lot initially but once built can last over 40 years, new concepts to use waste r out there too, look at our Aussie company SLX.
    Natural gas is a good fill in but not the answer, the NWS off WA is declining rapidly and the process of LNG is very high in energy use.
    Nuclear is the best option for the environment by far
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
0.2¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $2.654M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.2¢ 0.2¢ 0.2¢ $210 104.8K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
64 38848316 0.2¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
0.3¢ 18281126 25
View Market Depth
Last trade - 12.28pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
BIT (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.