To be completely honest with you, it sounds like you are...

To be completely honest with you, it sounds like you are fixating on us and this forum a little too much. Are you following us around on other stocks we post on? Trying to get our attention? Who is really seeking validation here?

I've told you numerous times that I didn't lose any money as a result of Nathan and Andy Zhang.

It seems that you have concocted this idea that that I am blaming them for a personal financial loss. I guess all I can tell you is that is not the case and you can choose to believe it or not. I sold majority of my A2 shares in 2018 for a house deposit. I did quite well from A2M and just free carry a fraction of what I once held. Of course, the irony when I tell people that is they then say - "you should be grateful to these guys then". So I can't win either way.

And no, I don't think there is any obligation to overlook more recent poor management performance just because they shared in a successful period previously.

I do think it is a shame what they did to A2M the company in their final years and in particular when Nathan was involved in misleading shareholders in 2020. What happened at BUB really grabbed my attention because I had no idea up until then that Nathan and Zhang were so closely aligned outside of the A2M context and, then, I was struck by the similarities between the distribution failures at A2M and BUB. To see it happening a 3rd time at AHF, I felt like one of few posters who have paid attention to the trajectory of these guys and could see how they operate.

What you keep calling bias is simply my historical perspective on this having watched it unfold in real time in each case. When you see a pattern of behavior, and anticipate that it may be further repeated, that strikes me as sensible.

I have been transparent all along and engaged in detail with you on AHF's numbers and model, as you say, but I can't say that you have ever done the same. You have presented no numbers to support your predictions, regarding lofty share price possibilities or financial performance. You have skirted around the issue, deflected by calling me biased, followed me around, tried to get me to read your blogs, etc. anything but actually engage with the detail.

So if you have spent a lot of time researching the company, and you want to develop a following on twitter etc. that's all well and good. Good for you. But no one will take you seriously if you ONLY repeat the same narrative and never engage with actual metrics/evidence.