not accurate the counter argument for the so called “ public...

not accurate

the counter argument for the so called “ public interest” is that gas forecast coast is in the interest of the public.

it is the respondent - the federal government who only have s very narrow base for their case.

Asset only need to demonstrate that their financial capacity is not a valid nor lawful reason to refuse. NOPTA advised the JA of this. Ed chose to ignore advice from NOPTA. This argument is not a high bar. NOPTA have already shown why financial capacity is not a valid reason. In this matter.
Asset only need to show that financial capacity is not a lawful reason to refuse.

NOPTA have already stated unequivocally that “public interest “ alone does not constitute a valid or lawful reason.

Ed has dealt his hand with two reasons, one of which NOPTA has stated is not valid.

Thr federal government will need to show why they chose to reject NOPTAs advice and recommendation.

The governor general office will advise if the matter is to be contested