What baffles me is that the WA government have allowed Cauldron to spend 14 million$ defining this low cost and low environmental impact resource, and then they flip flop and say no, but then allow high cost high environmental impact U project to be approved. Surely Cauldron can sue the WA government for this?
With net zero emissions targets it can only be a positive for Cauldron's uranium deposit. Not to mention the AUstralian government ordering 8 nuclear submarines.
All Uranium asx listed companies have at least 5x in value, yet Cauldron has remained unchanged despite having the resource ready to mine now at current U price.
A please explain is needed from 'common sense' perspective.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report
CXU
cauldron energy limited
Add to My Watchlist
11.1%
!
0.8¢

What baffles me is that the WA government have allowed Cauldron...
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
-0.001(11.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.32M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | 0.8¢ | $90.67K | 11.32M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 10797636 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.8¢ | 385524 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 10797636 | 0.007 |
8 | 7716666 | 0.006 |
8 | 4037010 | 0.005 |
5 | 5476250 | 0.004 |
6 | 8601999 | 0.003 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.008 | 385524 | 2 |
0.009 | 4916077 | 12 |
0.010 | 4330284 | 10 |
0.011 | 2107947 | 4 |
0.012 | 1673750 | 6 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 29/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CXU (ASX) Chart |