Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report, page-14

Poke, they won't be breathing in radioactive dust, dust suppression will be in place. Anyway, they could go for non-blasting methods, an interesting article here:
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2020-0245/html

More expensive and slower perhaps, but would get around many of the problems, and might suit the terrain.

Also, how many times are you going to repeat the rubbish about a Kvanefjeld being a radioactive mine. Some Canadian mines have concentrations of up to 200,000 ppm Uranium, some 650 times the concentration at Kvanefjeld. I get it that you are pushing EPM (and note I am a modest shareholder in that) but do you really think Greenlanders are going to fall for your frenetic down ramping of GML?