ETM 0.00% 2.3¢ energy transition minerals ltd

Poke, they won't be breathing in radioactive dust, dust...

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 148 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 90
    Poke, they won't be breathing in radioactive dust, dust suppression will be in place. Anyway, they could go for non-blasting methods, an interesting article here:
    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2020-0245/html

    More expensive and slower perhaps, but would get around many of the problems, and might suit the terrain.

    Also, how many times are you going to repeat the rubbish about a Kvanefjeld being a radioactive mine. Some Canadian mines have concentrations of up to 200,000 ppm Uranium, some 650 times the concentration at Kvanefjeld. I get it that you are pushing EPM (and note I am a modest shareholder in that) but do you really think Greenlanders are going to fall for your frenetic down ramping of GML?


 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.