Under the paragraph heading "Environmental" the company talks...

Under the paragraph heading "Environmental" the company talks about both AN and AC.
Firstly, AN:
"The Company lodged a draft Environmental Scoping Document (ESD) for Arrowsmith North
with the Environmental Protection Authority of Western Australia (EPA) to define the form,
content, timing and procedure of the environmental review, required by s.40(3) of the
Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) (EP Act). VRX has prepared the draft ESD
according to the procedures in the EPA’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Part IV
Divisions 1 and 2) Procedures Manual (EPA, 2020). The Company is awaiting comments from
the EPA on the review before lodging the final formal documentation. This review will
determine the requirement for any further studies and the timing of the EIA assessment and
public consultation required."

Then AC:
"During the quarter the Company also lodged a referral and supporting information document
for the Arrowsmith Central Silica Sand project with the EPA under section 38 of the EP Act.
The EPA’s Statement of Environmental Principles, Factors and Objectives provides a list of
potential key environmental factors to consider for an EIA, which include requiring assessment
from initial baseline surveys, project planning and consultation processes. The referral
identifies the relevant baseline environmental information for the receiving environment,
proposal activities, mitigation measures, impacts and underlying assumptions.
The EPA has 28 days to determine whether to assess the referred proposal and, if so, what
level of assessment to assign. This timeframe starts once the EPA has received all required
information and has determined the referral to be valid. The EPA’s decision to assess the
proposal will be published on the EPA’s website in due course. Based on the EPA’s decision
on Arrowsmith North, the Company is anticipating a Public Environmental Review (PER) level
of assessment."

What's the confusion here? Jumping at shadows imo.