Seeing what you post and having 3 minutes to check sometimes...

Seeing what you post and having 3 minutes to check sometimes brings things you missed/forgot into sharper focus. Not exactly the case but I did look at the estimates I made for C3 and noticed hole 136 was put at very low.

It definitely is not that as it is a test only slightly below Hole 80 (836m 0.4%Cu with a higher grade core of 436m 0.5 +0.2Au)
136 Azi 41 dip -74
080 Azi 35 dip -70
Both holes will probably deviate in a similar manner so they well be relatively close at the 962m EOH depth for 136. That 136 was stopped at this depth suggests it had passed the main zone of interest that was between 576-1372 in hole 80. Still a good chance that there was a 0.4%+ intersection in the order of several hundred metres. This hole could be just at the margin of the higher grade in the south flank.

If Satellite interpreted holes N8 and N27 are drilled they will be tests of this margin.

Two other holes may be precollars - 146 and (less likely) 163.

Summarizing these changes gives a more positive view than my previous post. Hope this eventuates on the more positive side.