As far as i can tell in the original version they divided $623k...

As far as i can tell in the original version they divided $623k /$398k and said that it equaled 2, and hence avoided having to provide an further answers to question 8.8.

In the revised version they divided the exact same numbers $623/$398 and admitted it equals 1.6 (well actually 1.56, but anyway) and have been required by the ASX to answer question 8.8

Which makes you scratch your head as to the explanation provided in the cover sheet which says "the revised forecast more properly reflects"
when there is 'no revised' forecast provided.