Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report, page-53

Who determines the outcome is 'unfair'. That's usually the talk of sore losers. Do you remember EPM28285? Carnaby and Hammer had competing applications, both even showed it on their land holding maps. The department awarded the EPM to hammer, a ruling in their favour (one they were more than happy to accept) of many square kilometers directly north of lady fanny/lady vampire in the IOCG corridor. Carnaby accepted the decision and moved on.

Now a few acres are in dispute at Mount Hope and Hammer potentially refuses to accept a ruling based on pretty solid grounds (cadastral survey) and talking about appeals ect. One way to look at it would be that based on the surveyed boundaries the ground hammer says they're losing was never theres to lose anyway. Lets see what they chose to do once they receive the detailed reasoning.