Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report, page-19

Good spotting.
With what's happened in RB-23-011, there may well have been a decision that due to the limited drilling window remaining and the importance of some other planned holes, it was better to complete other holes and abandon RB-23-013 within this program of drilling. The combination of the JORC update table of intercepts and the 31 March map (both below) make it clear that there is a reasonably complex stacked pegmatite situation around RB-23-011. There may also be part-mineralisation and at least in that location the mineralised intercepts were thin. This is going to require drill spacing that is closer than what RB-23-013 was going to deliver to understand. Having the assay's should also assist in planning the best next hole.

The diagram in 31 March showed five intercepts. One near surface, one mid hole and three lower intercepts. The table of intercepts showed the 4m near surface intercept, the thin mid-hole intercept and two lower intercepts. On the table nothing was noted as being wide. On the visual drawing, the bottom intercept is widening out. From the map view the pegmatite intersection is a lot wider than 4m, visually it looks nearer 30m but it may be only partly mineralised. Assay's will be required to figure out what's happening.