hi
I’m not on Twitter thankfully
sure South China Sea has a slant
You will probably accept the stories in igf report and civil society - they two talk about what zjin paid and how it was worth 150 m and drc shortchanged - which again is my point - the value assigned by this is because Avz “ subsequently” offered 150 m which for the reports then highlights how zjin got it below value( value set by presumably Avz offering much more subsequently of course to the transaction being done with zjin as Avz offered less) and then of course they pound how money was agreed and partly paid and squandered
again can’t go revaluing things after a transaction is done imo- if we accept this revaluation then Avz shouldn’t complain about Dathomir wanting to revalue options agreements
either way I still
Maintain its odd how a transaction between drc and zjin reported as sold below value- uses a value Avz subsequently offered after a transaction was complete
I tried offering more
Money after an auction hammer dropped yesterday again but like before , the unconditional contract had exchanged- like Avz I had my chance and I was outbid- the vendor and agents have moved on - but was lucky I was rejected actually as the property burnt down overnight and the zoning changed - turns out the buyer now owns a block of dirt unable to rebuild and operate a business there- just like zjin -
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVZ
- Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report
Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report, page-105
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)