AnalysisBut, yeah, you’re absolutely right there Donna, it is...

Analysis

But, yeah, you’re absolutely right there Donna, it is increased probability because this is a very prospective ground, but the probability is still very low,

Refers to Block 4 both surface and underground resources

quantifying that is quite challenging.

We don't really know the probabilities

One thing I will point out though is this a well explored region, you know, going back to old-timers to modern methods today. So, what I would say a lower probability of subsurface mineralisation, I think the high probability comes at depth.

Lower probability at subsurface but high probability at depth?

And importantly, if there is in the future development of a mine there is a higher chance, if it gets to that point, it will be underground development where the actual surface exploration is much reduced.

This discussion refers to relative probabilities not absolute ones.
A reasonable person would not conclude that the company has been libelled.

But you never know when the onus to disprove libel comes back to me.

I will ask hot copper to remove my posts on this particular topic

my opinion