Originally posted by zeno9
Von
You say: "
I know of numerous cultivation groups that would be keen, I've offered to put SP3 in touch and can't get a response."
I've been scratching my head for months now trying to work out why management would not respond to your offer to put them in touch with cultivation groups that you say are keen to trial the company's thermal cameras. Put simply, something definitely doesn't add up.
However, a question that you might want to ponder and respond to when convenient is this: ... if the numerous cultivation groups that you know of are indeed so keen to trial the Spectur product(s), why is it that none of them (apparently) have taken the initiative to contact Spectur themselves to find out more about the product technical scope and features of Spectur's product offerings, trial options, pricing etc? Prima facie, something also doesn't seem to add up on that side of the equation.
zeno9
I’ve referred these partied the product, they like it and have requested additional information - SP3 refuse to liaise with me or provide it, I’m not about to go back to these contacts and say “look the company refuses to even return a phone call regarding your interest, so can you email them direct please”.
If you want the truth:-
— I referred them Colombia’s largest medical cannabis cultivator who was keen on a trial at their 24ha site. SP3 reviewed the deal in further detail, however there was issues with it being too remote signal wise
- I referred them a deal in Canada with the founder of Tweed, which later became Canopy. This was around a 9Ha outdoor operation. SP3 review that in detail, however there was some potential issue with snow
- I referred them to the head of one of the largest LP’s security division who liked the product and had reviewed the white paper. Darren never provided me an update
SP3 wrote a white paper identifying cannabis as the ideal sector, getting 12-16 hours sun a day, required by law, huge high value properties requiring massive spends. They with great interest reviewed early referrals to them by me in this sector. It wasn’t until I sprayed them for poor performance and refused their request to cease lobbying policitians about their shark warning system on twitter, that they no longer entertained any of my deals
Keeping in mind the leads I have already referred, I have sent inquiries via the website saying I could facilitate the sale of up to 4-8 thermal cameras to multiple other parties and they refuse to even inquire who or where. Yet a random on FB asks Peter Holton and is immediately responded to ? Tell me their isn’t personal conflict holding back potentially their biggest sales yet here ? I know 50-100 guys in cannabis or mining I could pitch this to tomorrow, another 1,000 to easily cold contact over 2 days.
They can’t in one breath say they are entertaining the roll out of potentially a shark warning system in USA at $20/day rental, meanwhile say “adhoc” deals worth minimum $50-100K+ to major cannabis and mining groups is not feasible because of no in country staff - that is bologna
1 major cannabis sale and 1 major mining sale this would be parabolic. Why can’t management achieve it ? I can
