We don't know how much it will cost to build. The point of the trade off analysis was to figure out how to get the most bang for our buck, as @vmp has pointed out.
If you can double capacity for spending something like 20% more (at a guess), that's pretty compelling. Definitely improves the NPV.
As for taking longer to build, we haven't got any indication that it would. Again, the idea was to look at getting off-the-shelf parts rather than having stuff bespoke made. Pretty rare for bespoke production to be quicker than off-the-shelf.
If you mean it takes longer to build because they've had to push the feasibility study back, then yes, that has had a negative impact on NPV. But that impact is just another year of discounting back cashflow.
So if you were working on an NPV of $X for 2500tpa, a 5000tpa plant will have an NPV of $2X.
Unless your discount rate for the extra year is greater than 50%, when 10-12% would be standard, then $2X/(1 + discount rate) is always going to be greater than X.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LPD
- Ann: Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 5B
Ann: Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 5B, page-107
Featured News
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(20.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.17M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $6.705K | 2.515M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
170 | 186161089 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 98743778 | 56 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
170 | 186161089 | 0.002 |
43 | 174261088 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 68743778 | 55 |
0.004 | 35646890 | 39 |
0.005 | 11336744 | 12 |
0.006 | 9385459 | 16 |
0.007 | 4963896 | 6 |
Last trade - 15.58pm 16/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LPD (ASX) Chart |