Ann: Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 5B, page-103

.


It will be interesting to see which way the Hancock investments in both play out, of course there is a game plan, one to which we are not privy.
GR would be well aware that ARU have absolutely no idea as to how to get a chemical separation plant up and running to scale and spec.
In my opinion, I believe she sees it as a priority to have the involvement of LYC to get the plant up and running, and possibly also involved in the design. LYC have a treasure trove of very useful IP which could save ARU one shite load of time and money.
Those who followed LYC's start up progression would be well aware as to the issues it faced in ramp up, and who they got help from to get the plant up and running.
And those who followed NTU's story would also be aware as to what they went through, and that was only a carbonate (so called pilot) plant.


Yes ARU have built in a two year ramp up, and have contingency dollar$ structured into finance should it be required, (which is good planning)
I do though question as to what magical powers they possess to be able to do this quicker than LYC.


Personally I don't believe that GR has the best interests of any ARU or LYC shareholder at the forefront of her mind, but how this plays out is definitely one to watch.
GR version of Top Gun, I feel the need the need for Greed


So TP when you say "ARU = not producer yet"
So sometime in 2030 maybe


Your cheap shots seem to be getting the better of you.
.