@Mudcrabber and @timmo
True, concentrate on what is real and measurable, Structural, that is why we are with deg and not Conglomerate dependant operations.
Conglomerate is an potential added value and @goldtowin has a point.
The cost of an ore sorter in the initial plant design may be of incredibly low cost and add considerable value if it can increase the output of a 100,000 oz/annum target.
Let’s wait for the pfs and our own assessment of our Conglomerate before we fix an opinion.
Obviously for me, I am reading a positive slant to this.
If I am wrong, then it’s back to what I originally invested in, structural, and we are sitting pretty.
If there is measurable advantages in our Conglomerate, then maximise those potentials.
I know this board will already be looking for the benifits, either way.
All we need to know is, how much is the Tomra?
I will tell you next week when I get an answer from them.
Kind regards, Wack.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Quarterly Activities Report - December 2018
@Mudcrabber and @timmoTrue, concentrate on what is real and...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add DEG (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$1.23 |
Change
0.005(0.41%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.935B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.25 | $1.25 | $1.21 | $7.412M | 6.019M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 101323 | $1.22 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.23 | 117472 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 19690 | 1.220 |
11 | 330724 | 1.215 |
8 | 173439 | 1.210 |
5 | 122154 | 1.205 |
7 | 112928 | 1.200 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.225 | 42275 | 7 |
1.230 | 161596 | 9 |
1.235 | 66812 | 3 |
1.240 | 138740 | 10 |
1.245 | 154290 | 7 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 17/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
DEG (ASX) Chart |