When trying to protect “information seekers from potential...

When trying to protect “information seekers from potential detriment”, you and others have blown up a single point from a lengthy and otherwise unremarkable review of the quarterly, to make it bigger then Ben Hur.

In doing this, your behaviour is counterproductive as it gives the issue far more airtime than it deserves. I’ve repeatedly mentioned that I really couldn’t care less about the grade. Unfortunately the repeated attempts to shout down dissenters probably serves as more of a red flag to those genuinely seeking objective information.

It’s just a bit desperate mate. As Elsa said, let it goooo