note: page 3....fig.3....is this the firsttime we have seen an...

note: page 3....fig.3....is this the firsttime we have seen an ip cross section for the actual calisto ore position (or close to it, being just north of)?

the colour scales are slightly misleading in that the magnitude of the calisto anomaly should appear as yellow (not red) when compared to the anomalies in fig.1 and fig.2 above it

as said before, they never showed us an ip cross section of calisto because it does not define any of the shape or possible grade properties of calisto, (to put it another way..ip in this location was usless in finding extensions to calisto), but at the same time, to their credit, to publish such a diagram earlier might have given false expectations about the much larger anomaly extension to the west.

(summary: the drilling on the western anomaly in fig.3 did not produce economic results so there's no reason to get excited about the northern anomalies)