Gee, fancy that Hugh. I wouldn't have thought it but two separate pits is the best outcome, leaving a huge remnant mineralized area at Darcy, sterilizing the deposit at depth and probably contributing to the explosion of the strip ratio, capex and costs? I guess that must be right as there were 'no environmental red flags' so that decision must have nothing to do with a water-course? I guess it must be because it was the best financial outcome. No other reason.
Gee, fancy that Hugh. I wouldn't have thought it but two...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RNX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.52M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | $18.73K | 2.097M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 2864809 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0¢ | 1366310 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.42pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RNX (ASX) Chart |