"in which a higher higher is due - from a TA perspective."
Would you like to explain this deduction? Simply NONSENSE. Nothing is "due".
"in which a higher higher is due - from a TA perspective." Would...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add OAK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
6.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.862M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 91166 | 6.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5¢ | 182500 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 16/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| OAK (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable