Yes I have a thought.
Nikec,
AISC is explainable:
- C1 costs was 1.88/lb in Q4.17 vs 1.86/lb in Q3.17
- above the C1 costs of 1.88/lb you have to add the sustaining capex of 0.61/lb
(they mentioned the 0.61/lb on page 4 of Q4.17 report!)
- So the 0.23/lb left costs includes Royalties of about 0.11 (as in prev. quarters) and Non-cash ROM inventory adjustments..
= aisc of 2.72/lb
So the capex of 0.61 had a big impact in this quarter because they had more costs because of the yearly closing (accruals for incoming invoices for repairs etc.).
So the explanation is/was bad on every quarter.. The closing financial report 2017 will show us, that the c1 and the aisc is a number we can't count on because if the c1 and aisc would be as stated.. we should have much more money left than they print it on their reports.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Quarterly Activities Report
Yes I have a thought. Nikec, AISC is explainable: - C1 costs was...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TGS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
INF
INFINITY LITHIUM CORPORATION LIMITED
Ryan Parkin, Managing Director & CEO
Ryan Parkin
Managing Director & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online