I have largely stayed absent from the thread lately as have been busy with other things, but try to keep an eye out during key announcement times, but what I can say, without doubt, is you seriously need to get a grip and be a bit more rash-ional... so much so I am going to spend some time breaking down your above, relatively uninformed, irrational logic...
1. June 2019 Quarter = 4th quarter of the year, aka between 1 April and 30 June (yes it would be easier if they said 4th quarter, would give all the 'simple minded' people a better understanding, however saying June 2019 Quarter is quite acceptable)
2. From what I can remember, no dividend was paid in 2nd quarter of last year either but to make the claim "cash is surprisingly tight at BT Mining" would be an assumption to far, but we should find out in a month either way. As personally, I don't mind missing out on a dividend in the next year or two if it means bigly gains from the investment in Canada. I'd rather capital be invested than risky debt (the thing that brought BT Mining's predecessor to its spectacular failure).
3. The logic of it? it seems there is more control and synergies in BT Mining or BRL which might help with increasing exploration/extending the life cycle (I don't really care who owns it to be honest - just glad it is now fully under BRL management - afterall - BRL management are the ones running BT Mining, not Talleys - they just own a share of it) I am not fussed on this point (for now at least) as NID appears to be performing well - everything is up on Q2 2018.
4. Conference call would be nice, but if I can save $200k on a media personnel who don't do much 90% of the year (not to mention lost time of executives, who are very busy), well I'd rather do this... hopefully at half year we'll have a more flashy presentation and conference call.
5. Boy and boy, I wish Solid energy had a bit more hedging in place - if they'd managed to stay afloat for just a bit longer they'd be killing it right now (like BT Mining), Hedging isn't about winning or losing - it is about security of income and risk reduction. I am more than happy for them to hedge at current rates. Look at those oil companies? oil price looked so so strong, couldn't go down some said, a headline in July (was it you?) saying "Oil prices could top $120 before year-end" (they were $71 at the time), December 2018 came along - not even 6 months later - and the oil price was in the 40's... and if your logic is "oh but coal is different" well then you really don't deserve any response from anyone!
6. BRL seemed to be pretty much maxed out in NID - it is disappointing they couldn't supply genesis everything they wanted but nothing to do with resource estimates - rather employment constraints (note that both mines were ahead of production target). However, it still would have been nice if further insight as to why they couldn't supply GNE was provided (maybe GNE wanted a price lower than what they had/could get via contract to someone else?)
7. 47 - 30 = 17 so I have no idea what the 7 or 8m you are referring to here!
8. Try doing some research - but I did it for you: earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, changes in fair value of hedges and other significant items... Mercury provided EBITDAF update yesterday if you were interested so it isn't some "what the dickens" thing
9. My read (into your post): you are nearly as delusional as an old angry man with no justification as to how you came up with a 7c figure.
Expand
(20min delay)