Originally posted by slay22
Regarding drill results, this has always been the wild card for ANW. They have already reported great drill results from previous campaigns, which leads me to believe there is certainly something significant in the area.
I'm not too concerned about the delayed assay results with the reasoning of reporting all together, this is standard practice and no one would be complaining if the the full campaign was completed on schedule and results reported all together. We did have drilling complications (now overcome) which has resulted in the delay of assay results.
Now, I would be concerned if there was complete radio silence on the the drilling results. No report on visuals sulphides, no photos. If they found anything material based on geologist visual inspections they need to report that to market, which they have. I also like the fact they have modified the plan for Mt-C and now doing diamond drills. A good drill campaign should evolve as results are received. The results could be spectacular, good, average or bad. All in all good signs so far and I'm leaning towards good to spectacular based on what's been shared so far.
literally just confirmed by email your thoughts. pembroke will be reported once recieved (not waiting on mt C). final assays are still to come and the in house geo needs them to "synthesise" the results. i.e log them on the map, interpret the channels etc... thats how we get pretty pictures
so no one should be stressing.
they will also will evaluate paying lind back if the opportunity arises, like last time. noting that lind have along time to convert they may not do so immediately.
no joy on stock pile or sales questions... have been provided to ceo to include in quarterly or answer in an ann.
hope that helps.
