'MEI may have been drilled straight down the mineralisation'.....which they clear did not but angled across!...conveniently ignore that don't we. Your comment therefore is wrong and and gives a very inaccurate understanding to forum members.
You also state:
- 'your claim that my wondering why one of the majors didn't take the tenement is false just has no logic. They would have known Crusader was broke and could have moved before MEI came along. Your assertation is C.R.A.P.'
Nice try...They were not even in the Alta Floresta belt at the time...they came afterwards...
then....Comparing us to some artisanal Victorian site that failed is like clutching at straws as the geology is totally different to here.
Juruena and Novo have similar geologies and Juruena has been successful in establishing gold mineralisation under the Garimpeiro pits so by logic there is a good chance that Novo will be successful also, and at much greater widths if the alteration across the pits is anything to go by(estimated to be 10's of metres).
Of course you only look at the negative with Tolga but do not look at his many successes, Syrah(largest graphite mine in the world that Tunks chose) and Bellevue Gold......and here the historical data and great bonanza grades MEI are continually finding together with increasing mineralisation outside indicated resources should give people factual and a positive reason to invest here!
You say I have an ego...nope that is you, an ego that defends the indefensible; false information!
For me the share is at a bargain basement price, and I will be buying more today.
I would not want to be caught with my pants down when we see those results from Novo; there is just too much potential and historical indicators there!
(20min delay)