Ah yes Marfis it must be nice to work for AML.-No pressure to...

Ah yes Marfis it must be nice to work for AML.

-No pressure to have a good work ethic?(just farm everything out to consultants to do at their leisure? (even the ASX releases seen to be written by a consultant)?

-No pressure to meet deadlines?
In fact we're not aware of a single deadline ever being met in all the years our group has been involved (and with no consequences other than the sick SP).

- as you say, the latest example, the PFS was meant to be out Q2, then delayed till Q3 and now it's Q4 and this is only a PFS not a DFS or a BFS...?

- perhaps the most unfortunate aspect is the total disdain shown to ordinary shareholders which is again witnessed in the EGM called solely to rubber stamp the Directors' latest share grab (and only a short time out from an AGM)?

We imagine it takes a special kind of individual to be a Director and also agree at the same time to be a paid consultant to the the largest shareholder and creditor (and then try to hinder the release of the details)? or another Director who also tries to start up another separate resource company while being paid as AML's full-time MD and then doesn't disclose it until directly asked about it at an AGM (with the Chairman then saying he doesn't have a problem with it)?

So much for any executive oversight or corporate governance?

Good thing Walford Creek seems to be an excellent resource so things should work out well for us loyal shareholders (if not, given the volumes of examples of the way shareholders have been treated, there could well be another surprise down the track a bit)?