No deception at all. You are the deceptive poster telling the market skaland has a positive npv?
Let’s keep a mine operating that is losing money. If skaland was owned by any other mining company it would have put it on care and maintenance until a profitable, deliverable, funded model was viable. This is common with mining companies to do this, maybe do some research, but we all know now your research skills are poor.
it has been 2 years of loses, with no pfs completed, don’t even know if the pfs can be completed due to no update from company if it is funded and I have a feeling positive management have no funds left to complete the pfs.
buy hey let’s lie to the other shareholders and make skaland have a positive npv when in fact it has zip.
No deception at all. You are the deceptive poster telling the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 86 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MRC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $25.59M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| MRC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable