Any holders who claims they disagree in SHE not being under...

Any holders who claims they disagree in SHE not being under priced and not a good company would have sold.
If they have not sold then
.
1) they do perceive value in SHE with good future prospects and are their for not being honest with their sentiment .
OR
2) They lack the emotional maturity needed to cut their loss's and they a probably doomed to lose money on most of their investments/trades.
.
Its as simple as that.

Its certainly not as simple as that but no one would expect you to understand anything outside your narrow and obsessive view on SHE and it's leadership or lack their of. Nwsflash value, things are going to change whether you like it or not. That is life. Shareholders have HAD ENOUGH. Keeping the same leadership will just mean more of the same. You have called our CEO a pawn with an employee mentality and raised questionable links between former/current directors and Credit Intelligence which has really dark clouds over it now with the past CEO claiming illegal activities and malpractice. Our CEO is CEO of AVW which has ZERO buyers and 170m SELLERS. Anyone can look at his time at MINQUEST and what the shareprice did during his time there. He's also on the board of HCT which continues to have dark clouds over it and terrible shareholder sentiment online. These are not adjectives shareholders want being used to describe their CEO. You still haven't put me on ignore and you won't keep me on ignore because of your sick obsession with controlling the narrative on here.