The only reason I ask about the deep dive you did is that I'm...

The only reason I ask about the deep dive you did is that I'm sure many on here would love to know if their was a real campaign to suppress the SP and that it not being because of other reasons such as unaligned, uninspiring, unmotivated, incompetent, ineffective, inexperienced management. I'm not saying any of those adjectives fit in this case but in my experience, posters on HC love to blame downramping or other wild conspiracies instead of putting their energies into those who have most control over shareholder value. I'm not sure why it's the case. You see, I've been looking at previous posts and I came across a number of simplywallstreet valuations being posted.on here. In some cases, it had out valuation at over 50 times our shareprice. Don't you think posting such things would be irresponsible and tantamount upramping if not true? It's hard to imagine being at this price when some want us to believe we're worth 50 times more? If fair value is .50, don't you think we'd be a little higher then we are now? If fair value is that high - or let's say even a fraction of that, why aren't our directors getting investors interested or interested themselves? Maybe you should provide them your findings of your deep dive?