This is crazy.
Until the recent cardioprotection discovery, the CoH 2020 paper arguably underpinned most of RAC's fundamental value, but the ASX thought it was of minimal interest and merited at most a non-price sensitive announcement, and consider ourselves lucky that the "ramping" was tolerated on that occasion.
Would the same ASX nonsense happen for a highly favourable geomagnetic survey report carried out by a reputable independent self-funded geologist just out of interest on someone else's tenement?
Ann: Quarterly Activity Report & Appendix 4C, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RAC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.61 |
Change
-0.055(3.31%) |
Mkt cap ! $273.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.66 | $1.68 | $1.61 | $271.5K | 166.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | $1.61 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.68 | 1305 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RAC (ASX) Chart |