Wow, impressive mental gymnastics there. Let’s break it down for you, since you’re so keen on misrepresenting what I said while simultaneously accusing me of spreading FUD:
1. Future expenditure and capital generation: You’re seriously arguing that a company with just $6m available, and advancing through a DFS, won't need to generate capital at some point? Really? Yes, progress like MRE updates and hydrogeological modeling is great, but do you think that’s the end of the road? Do project studies magically fund themselves from this point on? Pointing out that raising/generating capital will likely be necessary isn’t 'guessing'—it’s understanding how businesses actually operate.
2. ATL’s holding: Let me spell it out for you: unless there’s an escrow or some other bulletproof mechanism in place, there's wiggle room. That’s not me inventing conspiracy theories—it’s acknowledging reality. But sure, keep pretending that ATL is bound by some unbreakable pact and has no flexibility whatsoever.
And then there’s your finale—accusing me of pushing a FUD narrative. Here’s a thought: maybe not everyone who disagrees with you is ignorant or malicious. Maybe they’re just capable of thinking critically and don’t buy into your one-sided view.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)