I think they meant 657 thousand, and are ignoring the Column...

I think they meant 657 thousand, and are ignoring the Column weighting as they are not dealing with billions , as one might wrongly assume looking all the former figures obviously the numbers quoted are without the weighted '000 average applied, it would then make so much more sense. especially with a number that has 2 commas in it you wanna tell me they are currently dealing in billions ? That would be super when is it reflecting in the share-price