Ann: Quarterly Report 30 September 2014, page-148

Paul is a gentleman, scholar and demigod. He only posts factual, unbiased, accurate and well considered material and there is no reason including literally years of track record to think he'll ever get predictions wrong.

Adriano talks nonsense. Everything he says is completely wrong and stupid because it goes against my best interests according to the share purchase I have already made and am unwilling to reconsider.

Why are there still people who can't understand this?

The most bizarre bit is that the ones in love with the permabulls stay in love when they turn out to be wrong and develop ever increasing levels of hatred for the bears.

I reckon we should all go down to the casino with Paul and Adriano, sit down at the roulette wheel, take sides when one calls red and the other black, sit there like yes men while each gives his analysis about why they're going to be right, continue congratulating our man regardless of whether they turn out to be right or wrong, and remain convinced that their analysis was valid rather than it coming down to the outcome of unpredictable variables.

...seriously, PGI was either going to meet Paul's bullish predictions through good luck, or fail due to bad luck. This isn't the use of conventional technology with a resource of known quantity. They're developing something novel. That means we don't really know.

Having said that, I think we now have enough information to say we're likely to have at least a moderately profitable operation, but even that is fairly recent and slightly uncertain.

Go red!