One would need to be an expert in reading between the lines to...

One would need to be an expert in reading between the lines to take much from this, so Padock is probably close to the mark.
The way that a potential sale of Dimmit is phrased may be the most significant item: "as a way to eliminate leverage and provide capital for our growth plans." To eliminate leverage would seem to mean paying off both WF and Ramas. I have no idea what Dimmit might fetch in a forced sale but that would (I think) trigger the Ramas repayment, so the proceeds would have to exceed the debts or else the Company would be insolvent.
So I assume that the threat of a near-term sale is as much a bargaining chip as it is a real intention or a last resort.