PLL 5.13% 20.5¢ piedmont lithium inc.

Ann: Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), page-62

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 11,058 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 3715
    Which was why I first posted
    "Best to read this thoroughly ... and ignore those less read"

    Insulting and Blissfully Ignorant drinking the cool-aid spouted by ...

    IMO your assumption is correct and most see SYQ as a part of SYA ... so SYQ cash is SYA cash to spend as SYA sees fit. The notion it is separate cash and separate cash flows are a foreign concept, just like how it is funded and the JV/terms. I don't know how many times its been said that PLL is both the JV's largest customer (i.e. PLL buying from SYQ via its OTA) and a partner (a 25% equity owner of the JV) which contributes capital when the JV makes a "cash call" on its equity funders and a recipient of a cash dividend when the JV makes a distribution. The JV's working capital (its cash from equity funders and any operating cash flow retained) pays Opex. All this appears lost in translation along the line.

    I agree it done, by design, solely to point the finger of blame at PLL. The mantra of take PLL discussion to the PLL forum only applies if the post is made by a PLL shareholder. It's open season to trash PLL and its mgmt on SYA forum. Facts are not necessary - they usually are in the way and need to be buried ... the epiphany will come (yet again) how this JV actually does operate.

    Even the 113Ktpy remains misunderstood. When annual reporting is done it wont matter. Unlikely to be exactly 113Ktpy and that figure will be short or long (and wont that cause a ruckus) because shipments matter and all that's needed is an adjustment to the following year. If I were operating the JV though I would ship on the basis of how confident I am on the amount of production. I mean if I was "certain" the mine would produce 180Ktpy (for example) I sure as hell would not be shipping the first 80Kt as SYQ cargoes. But, if was "certain" of producing 250Ktpy I sure as heck would like to ship the first 100Kt as SYQ cargoes. Reality almost surely dictates alternate cargoes keeping PLL tonnage always on track for close to 113Ktpy.

    The factual documentation is the SEC filing we are looking at.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add PLL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
20.5¢
Change
0.010(5.13%)
Mkt cap ! $84.94M
Open High Low Value Volume
20.0¢ 20.5¢ 19.5¢ $198.6K 993.7K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
4 238140 19.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
20.5¢ 1324440 12
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 31/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
PLL (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.