I wouldn't mind a little more information on Hera AISC numbers. Especially given the relative stability in Dargues numbers and the drop in costs at Peak?
To me it sounds like they prioritized getting through mass-volume. Possibly some low-grade cut they wanted to churn through to get to better areas as part of the extension aims for the mine-life?
But I shouldn't need to be guessing that. They should be spelling it out for us. A loss of ~$6.5Mill for the qtr associated with Hera warrants a couple extra bullet points!?
Otherwise in these scenarios you may as well go broke sitting on the beach.
Looks like the short term strategy is cherry pick the best grades, maximize cash coffers. Then deliver Federation asap. Sounds good to me.
I wouldn't mind a little more information on Hera AISC numbers....
Add AMI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
19.5¢ |
Change
0.005(2.63%) |
Mkt cap ! $329.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 19.0¢ | 20.5¢ | 19.0¢ | $493.4K | 2.523M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 140710 | 19.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0¢ | 157210 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 24/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
19.8¢ |
Change
0.005 ( 1.54 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 19.0¢ | 20.0¢ | 19.0¢ | 1135319 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 24/05/2024 ? | |||||
| AMI (ASX) Chart |