Peer comparison with CLQ's Ni-Co-Sc deposit has some validity, albeit G88's deposit as defined so far is not as large in tonnage terms and has a lower tenor in Co and Sc than CLQ. Both seem derived from ultramafic weathering to form a mineralized supergene at the saprock/ bedrock interface. Todays CLQ's DFS announcement is therefore sobering in the light of the capex requirement for these lateritic/saprolitic type deposits, and the market took it badly. Actually no surprise I thought as these kinds of deposits are often hard to kickstart into a mining operation due the costs. However, if G88 can demonstrate it has a Direct Shipping Ore, ( dig it up, ship it out) then the equation is more favourable. The possibility of this was mentioned in an earlier announcement, a year or more ago I think, but not commented on since. Obviously as it turns out the CLQ deposit is not DSO and capex is required for a plant to beneficiate and extract the minerals.
Moreover and obviously, if G88 proves to have a massive nickel sulphide body within its lease then this dramatically changes the equation. The drilling surely would have to finished or nearly so by now. The 3 holes are not too deep. If the XRF had picked up a significant nickel show on the drill cuttings my gut tells me we would have heard something by now, if not a TH. If no announcement on progress by the end of this week, that would seem rather foreboding. A simple comment that drilling is complete and samples sent to lab with assays awaited, without any specific mention of Ni sulphide, would not go down to well I think with Mr Market
Regarding the JORC, I did a bit of number crunching over the weekend. Trawled back through the saprock drilling reports, over 100 holes done, from that a rough guide would be an average depth of mineralization of 20 metres, maybe a bit more, width of deposit about 25o metres on average and strikel ength over the drilled area about 3 kms. Mention has been made of 5kms but this extended length has not been in-filled drilled. So anyway, deposit size say 3000 x 250 x 20 = 15 million cubic metres, so about 35 million tonnes. Nickel I estimate at 0.6% average which is fairly good, similar to CLQ ( possibly a bit better than CLQ), although Co and Sc are somewhat lower. All hinges on DSO grade, and whether associated Ni sulphides in massive form are found.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Quicksilver - More Wide Nickel & Cobalt Intercepts
Peer comparison with CLQ's Ni-Co-Sc deposit has some validity,...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 74 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add G88 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.523M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 915231 | 1.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.2¢ | 609208 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 915231 | 0.011 |
9 | 1085897 | 0.010 |
3 | 565099 | 0.009 |
2 | 420000 | 0.008 |
1 | 200000 | 0.007 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.012 | 609208 | 3 |
0.013 | 1587103 | 2 |
0.014 | 83333 | 1 |
0.018 | 200000 | 1 |
0.019 | 100000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
G88 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable