The IP argument is rubbish. Publishing peer reviewed studies actually strengthens IP as it clearly establishes prior art.
And I could understand this strategy if RCE were going balls-to-the-wall getting P2 -> P3 trials ramped up and recruited.
But as we know they are just spinning up endless phase 1 trials that get abandoned, chasing new indications, collecting fat salaries with nothing to show from anything.
The IP argument is rubbish. Publishing peer reviewed studies...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RCE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
48.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(1.03%) |
Mkt cap ! $111.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 48.5¢ | 48.5¢ | 48.0¢ | $664 | 1.371K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 16317 | 47.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 48.5¢ | 1517 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RCE (ASX) Chart |