It's not a new discovery at depth. It's just extended the...

It's not a new discovery at depth. It's just extended the mineralisation 30m further down dip, by drilling down dip.

First, I've bodged in 2003-47-2 onto the DAN25003/DAN25004 section. 2003-47-2 is only 20m NW of these holes collar positions.

• DAN25004 dips -65
• DAN25003 dips -45
• 2003-47-2 dips -60.

So DAN25004 is steeper dipping than 2003-47-2 and the two hole traces approach one another at depth. I guess that DAN25004 hasn't upgraded the old drilling, as its 72m is 1% Cu. Guess that one's now the dodgy hole? You tell me.
Yopu know what's dodgy? Not putting 2003-47-2 on the cross section. It is literally right there. They literally have the data, it's in their database. The cross section window includes it. Or it should. But it just doesn't make it seem as unique and special and new.





Secondly, that section is only 33m NE of the section upon which DAN25008 is drilled. DAN25004/003 is 60m NW along the section line from the DAN25008 position. If you put all these holes on the same section, it is clear, as I have said previously, that DAN25008 is drilled down dip. Suprise surprise, you can add 30m depth pretty easily drilling down dip! Amazeballs. I think you're just confused about how small, in terms of an economic body of mineralisation, a 30m sectional window really is. Or 30m depth extension.

Here's a poser for you. Where's the collar details for DAN25007? If DAN25008 is dipping NW, and DAN25007 is dipping SE, and they are 10m away from each other in the sectional plane of the diagram, where's the mineralisation on DAN25007?

WCN is very selective about releasing collar info on its holes.
The DAN25008 release (6th May) only included holes 1, 3 and 8.

The release 13th May included holes 1, 2, 3 and 4;

The company's release 21st May included only hole 5;

They said hole 6 included 54m of visible sulphide, but there's no collar location, dip, azimuth or total depth. They didn't even put the position of the sulphide intersection on the hole trace in the section in the announcement.
There's no mention of sulphide in holes 7, which is on section with hole 8, and presumably is drilled to the SE.
2003-47-3, to the SW of here, has 98m of mins, so the system is open to the SW for another sixty whole metres. That's at least another 60 cross sections 1m thick where you don't get the 1960's drilling, the 2003-2005 drilling, or anything.




If you can't tell you're being mushroomed with selective information, more fool you.